jump to navigation

Swallowing Snot May Offend Allah! November 2, 2008

Posted by Anita in God is Imaginary.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

I’ve been suffering from some nasty phlegm issues lately, related to a condition called LPR (Laryngopharyngeal Reflux).

The mucous just sits there, in the back of my throat, and I can’t expel it, no matter how hard I try. Not pretty, not sexy, and extremely frustrating! (I know, I know – too much information.)

Anyway, in searching for some relief, I came across the following on islamtoday.net:


Question:
“I was praying an obligatory prayer and I had mucous in my mouth out of nowhere. I became confused and swallowed. I was also fasting at the time. Please tell me if my prayer and my fast are valid.”

Answer by Sheikh Muhammad b. Sâlih al-`Uthaymîn:

“Phlegm and mucous that do not reach the mouth do not cause the fast to break. This is the only opinion expressed on the matter in the (Hanbalî) school of law. If the phlegm and mucous reach the mouth and then the person swallows it back down, there is disagreement among the scholars regarding whether it breaks the fast. One opinion is that it does break the fast. They compare swallowing phlegm and mucous to the activities of eating and drinking. The other opinion is that it does not break the fast. They regard phlegm and mucous to be comparable to saliva. Even if a person gathers saliva in his mouth and swallows it, this will not break his fast. In a case where the scholars are divided in their opinions, then the matter must be referred back to the Qur’ân and Sunnah. Since we are in doubt about whether ingesting phlegm and mucous invalidates the fast, we must consider that the default assumption in Islamic Law in the absence of other evidence is that it does not do so. Based on this default assumption, we would say that it does not break the fast.”

Answer by Sheikh `Abd Allah b. Jibrîn:

“As a general rule, it is forbidden to deliberately swallow mucous on account of its dirtiness. It does not matter whether it comes from of from the throat or from the nose. If someone brings phlegm up from his chest into his mouth and then swallows it again, then he has broken his fast, since he has swallowed a substance that he could have avoided swallowing. On the other hand, if mucus descends on its own to his throat and is swallowed along with his saliva, it will not invalidate his fast. Please note that whatever invalidates a fast in this regard also invalidates prayer.”


This is beyond insane!

Religious “scholars” have actually debated whether or not swallowing mucous invalidates a fast?

It’s a bodily function for goodness’ sake! Do they seriously think their omniscient Allah – if he existed – would give a rat’s ass about such inconsequential nonsense?

Come on people, wake up and get a brain!

13-Year-Old Rape Victim Stoned to Death by Islamic Militants November 2, 2008

Posted by Anita in God is Imaginary.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment
An armed soldier guards the crowd at the site of the stoning.

An armed soldier guards onlookers at the site of the stoning.

A 13-year-old Somalian girl was raped by three men and then stoned to death by dozens of Islamic militants, as punishment for committing “adultery.”

Hundreds of people watched, as Aisha Duhulow was placed in a hole up to her neck for the execution. Stones were hurled at her head, and she was brought out of the hole three times to see if she was dead yet.

“This child suffered a horrendous death at the behest of the armed opposition groups who currently control Kismayo,” David Copeman, Amnesty International’s Somalia campaigner, said in a statement Friday.

Islamist leaders at the execution said the girl (who was erroneously reported to be 23) had breached Islamic law.

[sources: Cnews and Daily Mail]

Afraid of the Truth? Fear of Muslim Violence: “Pornographic” Historical Novel Pulled August 12, 2008

Posted by Anita in God is Imaginary.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
18 comments

Fundamentalist Muslims like to kill people, while moderate Muslims are easily offended.

Why?

I think it’s because their so-called “prophet” is an embarrassment… and woe be to anyone who draws attention to his sexual exploits.

For those of you who don’t know the story, here’s a quick recap:

At the age of 49, Muhammad was betrothed to a six-year-old girl named Aisha, who was the daughter of his friend Abu Bakr.

Three years later, at the age of nine, Aisha began menstruating: a sign for old man Muhammad to “marry” the child and sexually consummate their union.

Now, Muslims can sugarcoat this all they want – but adults who have sex with children are called pedophiles. They are child rapists who should be locked up and castrated. In other words, they are the usual sort of scum who convince themselves and their mindless followers that they are “prophets” of “god.”

So when a book by Sherry Jones dared to describe Muhammad’s very real sexual relationship with his child-bride… wouldn’tcha know it?… all hell broke loose.

According to Muslim journalist, Asra Q. Nomani, before writing The Jewel of Medina: A Tale of Lust, Love and Intrigue in the Prophet’s Harem, Ms. Jones learned Arabic, studied scholarly works about Aisha’s life, and came to admire her protagonist as a woman of courage. For her efforts, Ms. Jones signed a $100,000, two-book deal with Random House and The Jewel of Medina was slated to hit the streets today.

But Random House chickened out and reneged on their deal, because “credible and unrelated sources” said “the publication of this book might be offensive to some in the Muslim community… and could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment.”

Denise Spellberg, an associate professor of Islamic history at the University of Texas in Austin, is allegedly the one who instigated the panic.

According to Ms. Nomani, Ms. Spellberg contacted Shahed Amanullah, the editor of a popular Muslim website, and told him that the novel “made fun of Muslims and their history” and asked him to warn Muslims.

Mr. Amanullah then sent an e-mail to a listserv of Middle East and Islamic studies grad students, telling them that the forthcoming novel was found to be “incredibly offensive.”

The next day, Mr. Amanullah’s e-mail was posted on “Hussaini Youth,” a website for Shiite Muslims, with the headline, “Upcoming book, ‘Jewel of Medina’: A new attempt to slander the Prophet of Islam.”

Then some guy by the name of Ali Hemani proposed “a seven-point strategy” to ensure “the writer withdraws this book from the stores and apologise[s] [to] all the muslims across the world.”

Meanwhile, an editor at Random House’s Knopf imprint sent an e-mail to Knopf executives informing them that Ms. Spellberg thought there was a “very real possibility of major danger for the building and staff and widespread violence… a declaration of war… explosive stuff… a national security issue… far more controversial than the satanic verses and the Danish cartoons… [and] thinks the book should be withdrawn ASAP.”

Finally, the author was told that the publishing of her novel was indefinitely postponed for “fear of a possible terrorist threat from extremist Muslims” and concern for “the safety and security of the Random House building and employees.”

In defence of the book, Ms. Nomani writes, “For all those who believe the life of the prophet Muhammad can’t include stories of lust, anger and doubt, we need only read the Quran (18:110) where, it’s said, God instructed Muhammad to tell others: ‘I am only a mortal like you.’”

Muhammad was mortal all right, but rest assured, his “instructions” from Allah were nothing more than the voices in his head.

Ms. Spellberg called the novel a “very ugly, stupid piece of work.” Perhaps what she really meant was that Muhammad was a “very ugly, stupid piece of work.”

Here is an excerpt from the book:

This was the beginning of something new, something terrible. Soon I would be lying on my bed beneath him, squashed like a scarab beetle, flailing and sobbing while he slammed himself against me. He would not want to hurt me, but how could he help it? It’s always painful the first time.

The pain of consummation soon melted away. Muhammad was so gentle. I hardly felt the scorpion’s sting. To be in his arms, skin to skin, was the bliss I had longed for all my life.”

Ms. Spellberg is quoted as saying, “I don’t have a problem with historical fiction. I do have a problem with the deliberate misinterpretation of history. You can’t play with a sacred history and turn it into soft core pornography.”

Obviously, I don’t believe there’s anything “sacred” about Mohammad’s life. But I do think Ms. Spellberg has a point about “deliberate misinterpretation,” as I’m quite certain a nine-year-old girl would not have “longed” to be raped by a 52-year-old man.

As I said, Muhammad is likely an embarrassment to his modern-day followers who don’t have the cojones to admit their “prophet” was nothing but a sexual deviant, a womanizer, and a charlatan.

Sherry Jones was quoted as saying, “My portrayal of Muhammad is extremely respectful, and of the origins of Islam is very accurate and respectful… Muhammad says in the Koran that he was a mortal. I assume he did all the things a man does. He had 12 wives – I’m sure he had sex with them.”

Of course he did. But shhh…. don’t tell anybody.

[sources: The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, Answering Islam]